Case Studies
Please read from the case studies below to see why our clients choose a MicroC™ Product over other carbon sources: technical performance, customer support and cost effectiveness.
| |
Facility type |
Design Flow |
Actual Flow |
Treatment technology |
MicroC™ start date |
Previous carbon |
 |
Littleton Englewood WWTP
Englewood, CO |
50 MGD |
21 MGD |
Tetra® Deepbed™ Denite® System |
Trial Period: August 2009 |
Methanol |
 |
Blacks Ford WRF
Jacksonville, FL |
3 MGD |
1.5 MGD |
Sequencing Batch Reactor |
February 2009 |
Acetic Acid |
 |
West Haven WPCF
Connecticut |
12.5 MGD |
7.8 MGD |
MLE Activated Sludge Process |
October 2009 |
None |
 |
James River Treatment Plant
Newport News, VA |
20 MGD |
14.5 MGD |
4 stage w/ IFAS media |
April 2009 |
None |
 |
Fairfield, CT Municipal Plant |
9 MGD |
8.12 MGD |
Four stage/ Suspended Growth |
December 2007 |
Methanol |
 |
Clearwater, FL Municipal Plants |
13.5 MGD |
6.3 MGD |
Four Stage Bardenpho |
March 2008 |
none |
 |
Cromwell, CT Municipal Plant |
20 MGD |
20.2 MGD |
Converted MLE process |
September 2005 |
none |
 |
Two and a half years of effluent Total Nitrogen performance
using MicroC™ products in 29 New Jersey decentralized facilities. |
 |
Medford Lakes, NJ Municipal Plant |
|
0.37 MGD |
5-stage Bardenpho |
October 2005 |
Methanol |
 |
Residential subdivision |
22,000 |
12,963 |
ZENON Zeeweed® 500 MBR |
December 2004 |
Sucrose solution |
 |
Assisted living facility |
16,500 |
8,349 |
RUCK® CFT |
February 2002 |
none |
 |
Time share condominium community |
32,000 |
12,265 |
Anoxic tower |
September 2004 |
Methanol |
